Essay Philosophy

Essay Philosophy. Argument Essay #2: The Problem of EvilPurpose/objective.Many articles you read will have complicated dialectics where the author presents anÿargument, gives possible objections to the argument, and then gives a reply. When youÿread articles and you feel that the author is contradicting himself/herself, or is going backÿand forth, this is often an indication that the author is defending an argument against aÿpossible objection.It takes practice writing clearly so that your reader can follow this dialectic. Thisÿassignment will help you organize a dialectic so that you can understand and writeÿsophisticated arguments that handle possible objections.This paper also gives you practice in conversing with others, critiquing other?sÿarguments, or replying to their arguments against your position. Conversations usuallyÿhave a dialectic where someone gives an argument and another person disagrees. It isÿimportant to be respectful and encourage the flow of ideas, so that each person can fullyÿexplain their position and learn from different perspectives. In writing essays, alwaysÿwrite as if the reader has never heard of these arguments or terms.Instructions:Part One: Give a thesis statement and explain the argument for the Problem of Evil.ÿIn this essay, I will examine the argument for the Problem of Evil, a possible theodicy against the argument, and reply to the theodicy.The Problem of Evil is an argument that shows that God cannot be either all- powerful, all-knowing, and/or all good.ÿ[Outline an argument for the Problem of Evil. Explain why this argument shows that God cannot be all-powerful, and/or all-knowing,ÿWrite the following paragraphs and fill in the missing details. This activity is broken intoÿthree parts, but your paper should present one essay, with paragraphs that flow together.ÿInclude citation and bibliography. This is italicized here to indicate what you shouldÿwrite, but your final essay should not be in italics.ÿand/or all- good. Be sure to define an all-PKG god, define evil/ suffering, and give examples of different kinds of evil/ suffering. This may take 2-3 paragraphs.]Part Two: Explain one theodicy.One might object to the Problem of Evil by giving a theodicy. A theodicy isÿ________ [give the definition of theodicy. Make sure to explain that a theodicy will defend the position that God is all-PKG].One theodicy isÿ_____________ [choose ONE theodicy that we talked about in class. Be sure to explain how this theodicy shows that God is all-PKG even though evil/ suffering exists. Think about God would allow evil to exist or why he wouldn?t prevent it or intervene. You may use thought experiments, examples, or scenarios to illustrate your argument].Part Three: Explain a rejoinder to the theodicy.The defender of the Problem of Evil argument can reply to this theodicy by sayingÿ____________ÿ[Explain a problem with the specific theodicy you explained above. This may require you to show how the theodicy fails in showing that God must be all- powerful, all-knowing, or all-good.]I have explained the argument for the Problem of Evil, given a possible theodicy, and replied to that theodicy.ÿArgument Essay Rubric (1)Argument Essay Rubric (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddresses the QuestionThoroughly addresses all parts of the essay question20.0ÿptsAddresses most aspects of the essay question12.0ÿptsAddresses parts of the essay question8.0ÿptsFails to address all parts of the essay question0.0ÿpts20.0ÿptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of the philosopher’s position and argumentAccurately characterizes the philosopher’s position and the argument made in its favor.20.0ÿptsMostly accurate in describing the philosopher’s position and argument.12.0ÿptsTries to be accurate, but shows some confusion.8.0ÿptsEntirely inaccurate.0.0ÿpts20.0ÿptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent’s ArgumentStudents takes a clear position and defends it with an argument. Avoids clear fallacies in reasoning.20.0ÿptsStudent takes clear position and supports it with reasons.12.0ÿptsStudent takes a clear position, but does not support it well with arguments.8.0ÿptsStudent’s position is unclear and not supported by reasons.0.0ÿpts20.0ÿptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and ClarityExtremely well organized, clear and concise through ought.20.0ÿptsOrganized and clear.12.0ÿptsAttempts organization, but unclear in places or missing elements such as a thesis statement.8.0ÿptsLacks organization/unclear0.0ÿpts20.0ÿptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism (Spelling, Grammar, and Citations)Reflects careful editing, includes citations and work’s cited page.20.0ÿptsA few errors present, but they do not distract12.0ÿptsSeveral errors distract at times and/or missing citations.8.0ÿptsErrors throughought. Missing citations and work’s cite page.0.0ÿpts20.0ÿptsTotal Points:ÿ100.0PreviousNext

Essay Philosophy